delete pls

Jan 5, 2016
4,221
17,332
1,100
RSI Handle
NaffNaffBobFace
#23
May 25, 2017
128
512
200
RSI Handle
FradinRyth
#26
I haven't seen one scrap of evidence to suggest genders existed at the time fire was discovered. 😉

If people can refuse to believe in god because there is no evidence I can refuse to believe in the existence of male/female prior to the discovery of fire because there is no evidence.

(I am agnostic by the way)
Makes sense, before fire we had no need for genders since we didn't have a fire to lay someone down by and make sweet sweet snoo snoo with.
 
Jan 28, 2016
25
90
400
RSI Handle
DevilDogHog
#27
Dude, this is the internet toothpaste. Once its out there no amount of lubrication and forced ramming can shove it back it the hole that it came out of. Might as well take a picture of it and send it over snap chat and hope that certain people don't see it, like your long forgotten girlfriend from high school that you still hold a candle for and mistakenly friended on facebook but now don't want to unfriend because she actually said yes to your friend request, despite all the posts about how great her life is with "Bob" and their two beautiful kids, trolling over them with the same methodical addiction of a crack whore in an alley pulling tricks for a few moments of fantasy and self indulgence that maybe, just maybe if you didn't get so drunk that night at prom because you were nervous and trying to impress her, then puked on yourself because you never drank before that night, that maybe those coulda been your two beautiful kids and maybe she would be saying how great her life is with you to all her friends and "bob" would be the one trolling her on facebook instead of being the backstabbing best friend you wish you never had . . . oh look she just liked it. . . . man shes great *sigh*
 
Oct 14, 2015
1,057
3,647
1,150
RSI Handle
DMGunslinger
#29
Dude, this is the internet toothpaste. Once its out there no amount of lubrication and forced ramming can shove it back it the hole that it came out of. Might as well take a picture of it and send it over snap chat and hope that certain people don't see it, like your long forgotten girlfriend from high school that you still hold a candle for and mistakenly friended on facebook but now don't want to unfriend because she actually said yes to your friend request, despite all the posts about how great her life is with "Bob" and their two beautiful kids, trolling over them with the same methodical addiction of a crack whore in an alley pulling tricks for a few moments of fantasy and self indulgence that maybe, just maybe if you didn't get so drunk that night at prom because you were nervous and trying to impress her, then puked on yourself because you never drank before that night, that maybe those coulda been your two beautiful kids and maybe she would be saying how great her life is with you to all her friends and "bob" would be the one trolling her on facebook instead of being the backstabbing best friend you wish you never had . . . oh look she just liked it. . . . man shes great *sigh*
*Sniff*...This is amazing...I thought this kind of shit only happened to me! I'm not alone in the universe no more!👙
 
Jan 1, 2016
3,845
15,745
1,050
RSI Handle
CrudeSasquatch
#39
The mistake you made was using human kind when the proper term to use would either be mankind (get wrecked PC police) or humanity. 😉
Aaaaah.
[TRIGGERED]
Human, mankind and man are words for everyone.
Woman and Wereman are the correct words for the genders.
Men at work, man the rigging, etc, are the correct gender neutral terms for things! Why is a forest creature using proper English?
Because socialist Canadian schools!
 
Sep 28, 2017
403
1,478
400
RSI Handle
Deroth1
#40
Aaaaah.
[TRIGGERED]
Human, mankind and man are words for everyone.
Woman and Wereman are the correct words for the genders.
Men at work, man the rigging, etc, are the correct gender neutral terms for things! Why is a forest creature using proper English?
Because socialist Canadian schools!
All of those terms seem to exclude avian and sasquatch kind though, so clearly they're oppressive.